Guess the writers for the prompt: Day 2, 'You made me come all the way up here for this?'

[china_shop]

Any idea who wrote today's stories? Share your opinions here!

For Team Reality we have Suicide Is Painless.
And for Team Whimsy, Notes on the Impossibility of Nirvana.

Good luck, and happy guessing!

Comments

[aingeal8c.livejournal.com]

But then Fraser will be hatless and tragedy could ensue.

So here's hoping it is by ignazwisdom. ;-)

[0walking-naked0.livejournal.com]

Fraser has spare hats, he'll be fine :D

And I think I;m agreeing on , and here's hoping I can make the author link thingy work. I never tried it before.

[0walking-naked0.livejournal.com]

Nope, it didn't work. Fuck. I don't know how it works. And I even asked someone the other day, which is embarrassing because I forgot already. I think it might be ignazwisdom, but I'm not certain.

[j-s-cavalcante.livejournal.com]

If I understand what you're asking, you just need the LJ code. It's [less-than sign]lj user=[author_name][greater-than sign]

Without the brackets.

Does that help?

[akamine_chan]

Ooops, JS, you forgot the quotes.

So, it's:

< lj user="authorname" >

Take out the spaces before and after the < and > and voilá!

[j-s-cavalcante.livejournal.com]

Didn't forget the quotes. Left them out on purpose, because they aren't necessary.

[akamine_chan]

Huh. Did not know that. Sorry.

[j-s-cavalcante.livejournal.com]

NP. The ways of LJ, they are mysterious. :)

[0walking-naked0.livejournal.com]

Thank you everyone! I will try to remember it this time, I promise :D

[omphale]

Wait, really? They don't need to be there?

I so fail at LJ coding.

[j-s-cavalcante.livejournal.com]

They're not needed--try it! :)

I'm certainly no expert at LJ coding. It feels so primitive. In fact, when I found out what HTML coding was, I laughed...because it is exactly like old-fashioned word processing programs were in the dark ages 1980s. I kid you not. One would think there'd be a more 21t century way to do it, but, no. I was truly shocked.